
The government has disbursed about half of the $700 billion bailout package for the banking industry, and what good has it done?
A lot of it is, apparently, just sitting in the bank. A Government Accounting Office audit released earlier this month showed the Treasury Department doling out buckets of cash: $15 billion for Bank of America, $45 billion for Citigroup, $3.5 billion to Capital One, nearly $6.6 billion to U.S. Bancorp. The feds were essentially taking out the trash -- buying shares in various banks that had gotten themselves into trouble by issuing crappy mortgages using complicated formulas, assuming the cost of many of the mortgage-backed securities that were weighing down the balance sheets of every financial institution in the country. The feds were pumping money into these banks so they would feel free to make more loans -- better, simpler, sounder loans. The epidemic of exploding mortgages and failing institutions would ease. But the banks did not start making new loans. They seemed to sit on their federal windfalls. And the Bush administration kept handing out more.
Stock prices are still down. A half million jobs went up in smoke last month. The banks put one over on us again. Do you think giving money to the big three automakers will work out any better?
The t-shirt is available from Neatorama.
Stumble This



It is good to see that you all are thinking like good conservatives these days.
I had been laboring under the mistaken assumption that "wealth redistribution" meant helping people who didn't have any. Like the disabled, the elderly, children, people with health problems, those who can't get jobs, and even working people who can't pay their heating bills.
Would make sense to put money in the hands of people who need to spend it - working class people who have rent to pay, medicine and food to buy not just Wall St worried about their bonuses.
Even Santa wants a hand out.
http://flickr.com/photos/8839361@N06/3115482747/