The story is strange in itself: a guy burns down a barbershop because he saw his girlfriend in a porn picture on the wall inside. But that's not what you notice when the page comes up. They had to have an illustration of some sort, and a burned out building isn't quite sexy enough. The picture in question wasn't available, having been inside a burned building, so what do they do?
Of course, it's all just speculation. No one at the Metro nor their readers actually know what porn looks like.
(via Fark)
Stumble This
Reddit!
This sounds like a job for the Porn Inspector of the Age Verification Unit.
Cause the funny guy went to the car dealership.
Sam isn't the same original biker for the crayon situation at hand.
Casino river apperhendi mortisania ucorlasten. It aint no thang.
Carlsbad blew riverside out of the surf without carrington-smithson. I think it is wounded underneath the dorsalfin of course without knowing how to integrate by parts we are unable to come up with the area under the three dimensional curve. That tangent line was completely off so we solved it with a differential equation. That Laplace trasform was bullshit because it was an inproper integral.
The interdependence of the Wronskian and Abel's theorem is co-dependent on frictional fortitude.
Ha ha ha.
Simeon ain't got jack without a gat without the convection heat transfer, it is overheating causing massive entestatiality.
That is a nonhomogenius linear system for sure.
At least that's what it looks like.
Thanks, Dave. That's good to know.
You are ever so welcome.
Crack that riddle and I'll send you a free YNBNY t-shirt that smells like Dave.
What an absolute pathetic job by the reporter. It would have been a triumph for irony and karma that the picture would have been seen by thousands if not millions as a result of the boyfriend's attempt to keep it from being seen by dozens.
i like it this is part of life