YBNBY Logo
ornate line
Sex and the City Is a Movie? No Thank You
Sex_and_the_city_iso.jpgI am well aware that I am not within driving distance of the target audience for "Sex and the City." It's not produced for people like me; male and straight. However, I live in the world and follow pop culture fairly closely, so the show was difficult to avoid. I saw bits and pieces of it during the initial run on HBO. It was enough.

Now for some bizarre reason this show - that I'm pretty sure is about three high priced call girls and their mentor, a slutty older madam - is a feature length film coming to your local cinema. I know there will be an unlimited amount of "Ladies Night" outings to go see the shallow gals fawn over $500 shoes and talk about dildos, but you couldn't herd me into the theater with a cattle prod. I'd rather chew broken glass sprinkled with salt.

Though I find a large number of storytelling sins in the show, I only have one real reason for avoiding "Sex and the City" like a girl with seven herpes sores on her mouth.

One huge, stinking, iceberg-that-sunk-the-Titanic sized reason.

Before we get to the main reason, let's have a little fun with the small peripheral reasons why the show is rubbish, shall we? Come on, it will be a good time.

I had a buddy that watched the show with his girlfriend and he said, "It's a great 'New York show,' you need to watch it." I do love New York shows. I love this city like I love my Mom; unconditionally and without exception. I've wanted to live here ever since I read "Tales ofmanhattan.jpg a Fourth Grade Nothing" in, uh, fourth grade. (That Fudge, what a rascal. You can't eat a turtle.) I'm a lot like Woody Allen's character in "Manhattan." I "romanticize New York all out of proportion." I said I would give the show a chance. There was some good New York imagery, but then the characters talked. It was downhill from there.

In the first episode I watched I think I heard the words "sexpectations" and "sexploration" three times each. It was painful. What the show really has promoted is not female empowerment or the strong binds of friendship. What it promotes is shallowness, materialism and promiscuity. Don't even think of arguing otherwise. That would be like me arguing against the selfishness and narcissism of professional athletes. You can't debate it. That dog don't hunt.

A few mantras were repeated subliminally (and not so subliminally) throughout the run of "Sex and the City." Such as; Date men who are successful and rich, who cares if they are boring, boorish or a bastard. Your worth is partly defined by how much you spend on shoes and if you mirror the pages of the clichéd fashion magazines. I don't see how people can be such slaves to what magazine editors tell you to wear. The girls also seemed to be proud they were sluts. They embraced it, especially the old one. It's like when the rednecks suddenly decided they should be proud. "Ah hell, we are what we are, we might as well put up a front and pretend that it's a good thing."

PeterGriffin3_edited-full.jpgI also don't understand how Sarah Jessica Parker is a sex symbol. I'm with Peter Griffin who said, "They let Sarah Jessica Parker on television and she looks like a foot." My theory of why woman like her is the same with Drew Barrymore, Maggie Gyllenhaal or especially Renee Zellweger. (That one is baffling.) Woman think "Hey, I'm just as pretty, if not more so, than that girl. I don't hate her. We could be friends." Woman tend to hate the pretty girl. Sorry, but it's true.

Now, the main reason that the show, and by extension the movie, are un-watchable. The writing and dialogue are beyond bad. Laughably bad. "Hottie and the Nottie" bad. "Sex and the City" has, without a doubt, some of the worst, most corny, forced writing in the history of the telly. One bad pun after another. It makes "Will and Grace" look like "The West Wing." I heard one of the trollops say, "I'm a trisexual, I'll try anything once." Wahhhh ... wah. You see what she did there was take the prefix "tri" and substitute it for "try" or "to attempt," ... never mind.

That is just pathetic.

In fact, I find the writing pun-ishing! It gives me a hear-ache! See, it's awful when I do it too.

While watching that episode with my buddy and his girl I was laughing at the show, not with it. It was just ridiculous. So many lines felt like when you hear a piano player hit a bad note. A real clunker. It's totally obvious and the polite crowd will wince a little in unison. In "Sex and the City," it was one "clunker" after another. I kept asking things like, "Seriously, this is the show you like?" And "Which part is the funny part?" I didn't make it to the closing credits before the girlfriend said "Johnny, that's enough. Just go to your room if you don't get it." I did so. It was where I wanted to be anyway.

A couple years later a girl I was seeing tried to get me to reconsider "Sex and the City." Ironin.jpg relented because I'm a pushover and she was hot. The episode she tried to get me to watch had the hookers going to Atlantic City. The old one with the weird voice looked at a busty restaurant hostess and said, "who picked this breastaurant?" DONE! That's it for me, good night nurse. I turned the channel. That "joke" was the verbal equivalent of bamboo chutes under the fingernails. As Robert De Niro taught us in "Ronin" when asked about torture "Nobody can hold out indefinitely. Everybody has a limit." It's true, everybody breaks.

(SIDENOTE - It was similar to when I was dragged to the horrendous "Starsky and Hutch" film and Ben Stiller's character went to his dead mothers grave. He was there to pay his respects to his mom that died in the line of duty. His tribute? Putting a donut on her grave. Good one. Cops and donuts. Man that's funny. Cops love donuts don't they? Any "marijuana gives you the munchies" jokes you want to regale us with? How bout an airline peanuts zinger. Good hell. I stood up and walked out of the theater. "Starsky and Hutch" made the short list of films I have said "screw the tenner, I can't take it anymore.")

It's ironic that the Carrie character is supposed to be a writer and her column would be unreadable. She makes Cindy Adams look like F. Scott Fitzgerald.

A few months ago I had this discussion with two fans of the show. Two male fans of the show. I made my case for why the writing is awful and one said, "I love the writing, it's won tons of awards for the writing." Uh, nope. No it hasn't, not-a-one. The old squadush. The writing stinks on hot ice. I'm right, you're wrong.

The bad writing was - and is - masked by trendy clothes and restaurants, romantic New York City scenery and soap opera relationships. There's a reason why guys like me don't like "Grey's Anatomy," "Dawson's Creek," or "Melrose Place." I don't care who's dating who. Who's kissing who. I don't care. I haven't had many conversations with my buddies about their relationship problems, but we have debated for an hour about if Superman needs to eat or who would win in a fight between a bear and a tiger. Something interesting. Something that matters.

I want to be entertained. I want to laugh.

"Sex and the City" provides neither.


SNL made my point a few years ago.


StumbleUpon ToolbarStumble This    Submit to RedditReddit!
26 Comments

Dude, I feel you. I really think that show is largely responsible for the LA-ification i see around me all the time in Manhattan. It's a sad time for american culture.

said Sam on May 29, 2008 3:31 AM.

I managed to watch the first 15 minutes of the pilot and then I swore to never ever watch any of this show ever again. I felt a bit insulted as a woman. I mean not every female is like this.... although a lot seem to be why else would they watch this dumb tv show?

said yocat on May 29, 2008 3:40 AM.

Ladies, start your commenting...

said Echowood on May 29, 2008 9:25 AM.

As far as I can tell, Sarah Jessica Parker's "sex symbol" status was cemented in 1991, when she played the "wacky" boutique employee SanDeE* in the Steve Martin film "LA Story." Up until that point, I'd known her primarily as "that ugly, nerdy chick from 'Square Pegs'." Even back then, I suspected some kind of shady, back-room deal between studio execs had produced this decree, because I didn't get it, and neither did anyone contacted by my research team.

Another thing I never got was Carrie's "to die for" fashion on the show. While I'm certainly no fashion maven -- I buy most of my shirts in multi-packs -- I can still appreciate a stylish dresser, but Carrie's clothes always came across to me like the product of some drunk wardrobe person trying to see what they could get away with..."No WAY they're gonna let her wear this centerpiece I swiped from the ASPCA Gala last night as a HAT! OMG, they're actually FILMING her in it!"

Puns are actually a guilty pleasure of mine, so I never really had the burning hatred of Sex & The City you have, Johnny, I mostly just thought, "Meh. Better than watching an informercial, I guess." But the thing that really annoys me about this show is how EVERY woman in America thinks, "Oh, this show is just like me and my friends! It's like they made a show of OUR LIVES!" And of course, every woman is always the "Carrie" of her bunch, never the ancient skank or the fugly redhead.

Meh.

said Jeem on May 29, 2008 10:21 AM.

I can't stand that show either. The writing's horrible. The message is horrible. The acting really isn't that great either. But who can blame them when they're given those scripts to read. Ugh.

Though, I have to give it up to SNL. They hit the nail on the head and did it with humor. Also, Christina Aguilera did a great job as SaMANtha.

said Mattie on May 29, 2008 10:52 AM.

OK, it's a show on prostitutes and women relate to it? I don't get it.

I'm one of the many many people on earth who do not have HBO.

said Miss Cellania on May 29, 2008 11:19 AM.

As far as your own editing is concerned, there is a hard and fast rule to follow:

"BLANK makes BLANK look like BLANK" can be used once and only once per essay.

said Jeff on May 29, 2008 12:15 PM.

You are being way to hard on the show. The early seasons were terriffic. My favorite one was when Jack Tripper fell over the couch and Chrissy started crying.

said Don't Swayze Bro on May 29, 2008 12:37 PM.

I also like the episode where there is some sort of misunderstanding, Swayze. That was a good one.

said Johnny Wright on May 29, 2008 12:59 PM.

Carrie did dress like a clown crossed with a prostitute, but for those who think the show PROMOTED anything...come on. It's a tv show, not an advertisement or an after school special. It's entertainment. You either don't really know a lot of women, or you're just pissed they won't sleep with YOU. The show wasn't having the women date a different man every week...the show was just on weekly. Most women (AND MEN), who are single, tend to have a lot of sex and date a lot of people. Most of us, aren't just settling for whoever we can get.

Yes, a lot of it is cheesy, but some is pretty funny and they do make a lot of point that single women can relate to. yeah, so...yeah.

said Cali on May 29, 2008 3:53 PM.

Isn't an After School Special a television show?

I was hoping someone would try a little harder to defend the train wreck than a variation on the "you're just jealous" gambit.

said Johnny Wright on May 29, 2008 4:07 PM.

Superman does NOT need to eat.

said The Muggler on May 29, 2008 5:05 PM.

I don't think so either, Muggler. I could have used you at the Waverly Diner in 2002.

said Johnny Wright on May 29, 2008 5:21 PM.

amen.

said a. on May 30, 2008 4:57 AM.

Except under a Red Sun.

said Scaramouch on May 30, 2008 11:54 PM.

If you couldn't stand the series (I liked the series--and the writing for the most part)--actually it sounds like you've not seen the best episodes of the series--too bad. Guys (straight guys) could learn a lot from these women (don't listen to Samantha if you don't want to--she acts like the worst of the males anyway, but she does have insight at times)...but if you couldn't stand the series definitely don't go to the movie. I hated the movie. It was very conventional, boring and I wished I'd left. It's as if the series and the movie aren't from the same cloth...or the same writer. Any creativity from the series was drained out of the movie.
I'd add, though, all the guys in the series do not fall under your good-looking (more than average good-looking) and wealthy. Steve? Sorry, he's short, kind of funny-looking and is a bartender (he dates and marries Miranda who is an attorney.) Carrie dated Aiden for quite some time on the series and that guy was the best guy of all. He made furniture and was as handy as a guy could get. Tim the tool man would hide his face. And Harry (who is with Charlotte)...well, bring out the DVDs and take a look. These women aren't into just hot guys--uh, where you got that idea--not sure. Must have only paid attention to Samantha's character alone.
The women talking about relationships...maybe you don't want to hear it...obviously you don't...but there are too many TV shows and movies where people get blown up and the dialogue is horrible. And guys flock to them and for some stupid reason their girlfriends or wives go along. Remember that. Hey, I don't even watch the superbowl. No thanks. My husband can have his friends over and he can serve up the food. I'm outta here.
Carrie isn't suppose to be a sex symbol...wherever that came from is beyond me. She's a writer. And she loves funky clothes and expensive shoes. This comes to haunt her in one episode you'd love...she realizes she has no assets and she's in a financial bad way. An episode every woman should see.
Don't know how old you are but if you call these women sluts then you should know what goes on in the dominant hook-up culture on our college campuses--if you don't know, then you should educate yourself. Call it, get wasted and forget who you even slept with--it's beyond anything slutty (for girls and guys)--it's become dangerous. But the TV series doesn't show wasted girls and guys, not knowing who they're even with.
The movie is horrible though. Beyond horrible. And it could have been good--my opinion.

said Sara on June 17, 2008 12:33 PM.

That was hilarious Sara, thanks. Cracked me up.

said Johnny Wright on June 17, 2008 1:07 PM.

Whomever keeps calling the women on Sex and the City "prostitutes" "hookers" "skank" and assorted other misogynistic terms obviously has a problem with women who are sexually assertive, outspoken, confident, adventurous, that is, you have a problem with ANY women on tv who aren't cutesy or flirty little doormats whose lives revolve around whatever their MEN are into and whatever their MEN want. You "critics" (and I use the word loosely) of the show don't like the women characters of the show because they aren't your usual run of the mill, mainstream, unrealistic, porn-fed dumb fantasy of what you think women are supposed to be.

said YouJustDontGetIt on June 24, 2008 9:28 PM.

Or;

We've seen television shows that feature women who actually have the attributes you speak of -- The West Wing, 24, X Files, -- and are smart enough to discern the difference.

This is one of the spins the apologists of the show have. It doesn't hold water. It's ridiculous. And laughable.

Even if the hookers really were the type of women one should look up to, the writing would still be awful.

said Johnny Wright on June 25, 2008 4:16 AM.

You're an idiot, Johnny Wright. You probably call all women hookers. Especially when they don't do what you want. A hooker is a woman who gets PAID for sexual acts. Duh ?? The women on this show DON'T troll for paying customers. They engage in consensual sex with men they like.

Get a dictionary, loser.

said Fuck You on June 29, 2008 8:46 AM.

Hilarious.

All sarcastic comments will now be double-checked with a dictionary to make sure I use the word with 100% accuracy.

Thanks for making us laugh.

said Johnny Wright on June 29, 2008 9:07 AM.

I've come to the conclusion that I will never agree with your reviews Johnny but I'll tell you something , if you didn't see the majority of the episodes, like you didn't with Lost, then you have no grounds to review it at all. Again, you point out that you were forced to watch the shows or you did so because some dingy broad who for some fucked up reason decided to date you wanted you to give it a shot. I think you take your anger at being 'forced' to watch both Lost and SATC and let it cloud your judgment. I also have noticed that you have yet to do a review something you actually like. Do you just not like anything? Sex, like Lost, aren't big money makers because they're shitty shows ya doofus. Honestly. If you don't get SATC or Lost, you shouldn't be reviewing them for a pop culture blog considering they are an intricate part of pop culture. Duh.

I met SJP while they were filming the episode where she brings the Mulberry tree as a peace offering to Aiden. She was amazingly gracious and told her producers to let me take a picture with her in between shots which solidified my love for the show.

said Jeni Gump on June 29, 2008 3:08 PM.

Dear Jeni,

This is the last time I am going to respond to comments on this column.

The girl in question who asked me to watch Sex and the City was a junior at Columbia Law School.

I watched the first 3 season of Lost before I quit. That wasn't the majority of episodes, it was all of them. When I heard about the "throw the switch and the island disappears/moves" nonsense at the end of the season, I knew I had made the right choice.

Making money is absolutely no indication of quality. None. If we judged quality by ratings and money, then I would think Two and a Half Men and Daughtry are amazing.

"If you don't get SATC or Lost, you shouldn't be reviewing them for a pop culture blog considering they are an intricate part of pop culture. Duh." That makes no sense at all. None. So film reviewers are asked not to review films they don't like? Their whole job is reviewing things they don't like.

There is no defense for the atrocious writing of Sex and the City. Of course, nobody really attempts to do so -- because you can't. My judgment is sound and correct.

Overlooking my real criticism of the show -- the corny, hackneyed, pun-happy writing -- and calling me misogynistic is ridiculous. It's third grade logic.

I stand by my writing 100%.

Love,

Johnny Wright

said Johnny Wright on June 29, 2008 3:53 PM.

Really?

You're done?

Even if I start virtually poking you in the side?

said Jeni Gump on June 29, 2008 5:08 PM.

poke

said Jeni Gump on June 29, 2008 6:44 PM.

poke

said Jeni Gump on June 30, 2008 4:12 PM.
Post a comment

NEW! Click here to add a video comment.
The
greatest
pop culture
blog on the
planet.
 
Or
maybe not.