YBNBY Logo
ornate line
David Beckham has a foreskin

Dbeckhamnude-Tm
For some weird reason, I thought that worth mentioning, if only to open up a debate on the pros and cons. Full pics here. (via WoW)

Share on Facebook StumbleUpon ToolbarStumble This    Submit to RedditReddit!

Related Posts Widget for Blogs by LinkWithin

14 Comments

foreskins are gross. i don't care how often the dude washes his junk, i'm not putting my mouth on that flappy shit. ick ick ick.

() said ew on April 17, 2007 4:42 PM.

Says the individual with a set of genitalia infinitely more "gross" in terms of smell and bacteria than a healthy uncircumcised penis could ever be (assuming the above poster is a woman).

Also, since when is Beckham Jesus? Not that he shouldn't be crucified in a similar manner... just sayin...

() said Lusus on April 18, 2007 12:56 AM.

The headline is incorrect.
It should say "David Beckham is a foreskin."

() said Pondscum on April 18, 2007 1:01 AM.

Rock on Beckham

I love my foreskin and am very proud that I am not mutilated and am %100 man.

How embarrassing life must be to have to live with a huge scar on your cock.

The mutilation and torture of young boys must end.

() said Twitchings on April 18, 2007 11:24 AM.

Most british men do. I only know one guy who's circumcised here.

() said j on April 18, 2007 12:53 PM.

lord, it's just fucking foreskin. It goes away when the guy has an erection. GET OVER IT.

() said tan-tan on April 18, 2007 3:32 PM.

lord, it's just fucking foreskin. It goes away when the guy has an erection. GET OVER IT.

() said tan-tan on April 18, 2007 3:33 PM.

look good himself and hot. I don't care whatever he want to do for fun.

() said cooler on April 18, 2007 9:49 PM.

Foreskins are fuckin' ace. n_n

() said Emmers on April 18, 2007 10:33 PM.

Fact: Circumcision can halve the risk of a man picking up the HIV infection which leads to Aids.

Whether or not you agree with it or not you have at least on solid reasons to justify it now.

I do find it strange that this study was conducted by a guy named "Dr Kevin De Cock" who is the director of the HIV/Aids department. That's just too weird.

Just google it:
HIV + circumcision + Dr Kevin De Cock

It's no joke. The story was posted by all the big news sites like Reuters and BBC. Sounds like a joke though.

() said christian gehrke on April 19, 2007 8:40 AM.

Fact: Cutting off ones penis reduces the chances of contracting Aids through sexual contact xxx%. Wear a condom and lets keep this argument to the territory it was born in - the ritual of circumcision significantly predates Aids.

At the end of the day it's a cost/benefit thing with a lot of emotion invested at either end of the argument.

Personally I'm uncircumcised and considering it.

() said DarkCraft on April 24, 2007 4:03 AM.

Uncircumcised willies are far more sensitive because they spend most of their time protected by the foreskin.

However, because the capilaries are not protected by thickened skin the risk of infection is increased. So wear a rubber.

Wanking is also harder when you don't have a readily made sheath to do it with and need to grab the lube if you fancy a bash.

() said cavalier on April 24, 2007 12:21 PM.

You're not cut, and you're considering it? Are you mad?

() said Scaramouch on April 24, 2007 1:29 PM.

Ha Ha Ha...this is too funny:
Dr. De Cock-
and...he does a study about penises!
truth is way the hell stranger than fiction, indeed.

circumcision in this day and age is 100% un-necessary,
esp. for health reasons. not being circumcised, I can tell ya, my "johnson" has been doing just fine all these years. healthy as a horse am I! eh...
if ya wanna scar your body for religious reasons,
that's a different story for a different topic (religion and its absurdity...)

() said ivan on May 11, 2007 4:43 PM.
Post a comment
The
greatest
pop culture
blog on the
planet.
 
Or
maybe not.